Trends in Hearing

Difficulty perceiving speech in noise is the primary complaint of patients seeking hearing healthcare, even absent overt losses in audiometric thresholds. Yet current clinical practice largely focuses on sensory function while ignoring the potentially outsized effects of executive function on everyday suprathreshold listening. Speech perception in noise depends on the dynamic interplay between the fidelity of sensory coding along the auditory pathway and higher-order top-down cognitive processes that support goal-directed listening, both of which can independently change across the lifespan. Here we examined how two subcomponents of executive function, working memory and inhibitory control, vary across the adult lifespan and contribute to speech-in-noise performance. Two hundred participants aged 18 to 73 with normal hearing thresholds were tested on a validated online auditory psychophysics platform. Working memory was assessed with an n-back task and inhibitory control with an auditory Stroop task. Participants then performed two speech-in-noise tasks: a modified rhyme test emphasizing sensory coding through energetic masking at the cochlea, and a matrix sentence task emphasizing executive function through informational masking. Age significantly affected performance on both tasks. Aging was associated with reduced inhibitory control (increased Stroop cost) but no significant effect on working memory. Regression analyses revealed that both working memory and inhibitory control predicted performance on the informational masking task, whereas only inhibitory control predicted performance on the energetic masking task. These findings underscore the critical role of executive function in everyday suprathreshold listening and support including cognitive measures in clinical assessments of hearing difficulties.

The pure-tone audiogram remains the cornerstone of hearing assessment, yet it captures only part of the functional consequences of cochlear damage. Most phenotyping schemes rely solely on the audiogram, which cannot detect hidden suprathreshold dysfunction when thresholds are normal. How best to represent audiological data - as discrete phenotypes or as a continuous space - remains unresolved. Using a retrospective database from the Copenhagen Hearing and Balance Centre, Rigshospitalet (Denmark; 1995-2022; 251986 ear-session units from 81883 adults with normal or sensorineural audiograms), we compared linear (PCA) and non-linear (UMAP) embeddings of the audiogram alone and with word recognition in quiet (WRSmax-Q). Here we show that a linear embedding suffices for the audiogram, but a non-linear one becomes advantageous once suprathreshold measures are added. PCA compressed the audiogram onto two interpretable axes, overall level and slope, explaining 91.5% of the variance, with ears forming a continuous cloud that published reference schemes tiled into overlapping regions. For the audiogram alone, UMAP recovered the same organisation. WRSmax-Q varied widely among ears with similar audiograms; adding it left the PCA unchanged but reorganised the UMAP. A synthetic experiment illustrated this: ears with identical audiograms but different WRSmax-Q separated under UMAP, not PCA. Combining thresholds with WRSmax-Q, UMAP yielded a continuous representation - a prototype Hearing Loss Map - where each ear's position reflects threshold and suprathreshold measures. Representing hearing loss as a location in a continuous space rather than as discrete categories may better reflect its graded nature, with clinical relevance for individual patients.

Several types of cues contribute to speech recognition in multi-talker environments. In this study, we investigated how talker head-orientation related (THOR) cues and extended high- frequency (EHF; >8kHz) cues affect speech-in-speech recognition for both female and male speech. We examined the THOR benefit associated with a non-facing masker talker head orientation (relative to a facing orientation) as a function of masker talker facing angle. The target talker always faced the listener, whereas co-located maskers were tested with eight different masker head angles, ranging from 0{degrees} (facing the listener) to facing 180{degrees} away. Two filtering conditions were tested: full- band and low-pass filtered at 8 kHz. A THOR benefit was observed at masker head angles greater than 45{degrees}, increasing from 2 dB to 8 dB between angles of 67.5{degrees} and 180{degrees}. This benefit was reduced for low-pass filtered speech. Access to EHF cues improved performance, but only for masker head angles >22.5{degrees}. There was no significant relationship between 16-kHz pure-tone thresholds and performance for young, normal-hearing listeners with good EHF hearing. These findings indicate that listeners benefit from non-facing masker talker head orientations >45{degrees} when the target talker is facing the listener, with greater benefit for larger head angles.

Intelligible speech disrupts selective auditory attention more than an unintelligible stream. However, low-level acoustic features of intelligible speech are relatively similar to target speech, confounding results. While controlling acoustic similarity and limiting energetic masking, we examined how masker intelligibility affects behavior and electroencephalography (EEG). Normal hearing listeners detected color words within a target stream of randomly timed words while ignoring an ongoing masker. Maskers were either spoken by the same or a different talker and comprised either isochronous sequences of intelligible words or temporally scrambled versions. Scrambled maskers either lacked broadband energy changes over time (Experiment 1) or were amplitude modulated to have the same energy profiles as intelligible, isochronous maskers (Experiment 2). In both experiments, scrambled maskers yielded better performance than intelligible maskers. For intelligible maskers, performance was better for different compared to identical talkers. EEG responses paralleled behavior: target-evoked onset responses were larger for scrambled than for intelligible maskers, particularly for identical talkers. Later target recognition responses were larger for color than other target words but unaffected by masker type or talker. Even when low-level acoustic features were carefully matched, intelligible maskers impaired auditory attention and reduced target-evoked neural responses more than scrambled maskers, implicating early sensory filtering.

Studies employing and evaluating hearing-aid self-adjustments frequently label the resulting settings as 'preferences' without questioning that label. There is a lack of inquiries into the rationale behind participants' choices or their approach to self-adjustment. We here employed a think-aloud protocol concurrent with individuals' self-adjustments to capture qualitative perspectives on these processes. Thirty-six adult hearing-aid users were asked to verbalise what they were thinking while adjusting to their preference three stimuli (music, speech or speech in noise) using three control interfaces (1 slider jointly controlling bass/treble, 2 sliders separately controlling bass and treble or 3 sliders controlling bass, mid and treble). Audio-video recordings were transcribed, annotated and analysed using inductive content coding and thematic analysis. Participants' approach and navigation of the self-adjustment process was best defined as a continuum between exploratory and anticipatory archetypes, with both types sometimes occurring at different stages within the same adjustment. The exploratory type initially assesses control functions, then selects the optimal setting from available options, and evaluates sound changes affectively in isolation or comparatively against prior settings. The anticipatory type begins by evaluating the sound, identifying issues, adjusting settings guided by past experiences, and evaluating adjustments against the identified issues. Additionally, the descriptors elicited during adjustments generally agreed with expert-based data. The resulting qualitative framework of self-adjustment helps explain both how hearing-aid users navigate the personalisation process and how self-adjustment can promote greater understanding of the options available and greater ownership in that process.

Standard hearing tests miss cochlear neural degeneration (CND), the loss of synapses between inner hair cells and auditory nerve fibers that may underlie unexplained hearing difficulty in roughly one in ten adults. Envelope following responses (EFRs) can index this neural loss noninvasively, but conventional protocols are too slow for clinical use. We tested a dynamic amplitude-modulated (dAM) EFR that sweeps the full modulation spectrum in a single brief stimulus. In Mongolian gerbils with histologically verified CND, dAM EFRs revealed selective deficits at fast modulation rates without threshold elevation. A machine-learning classifier distinguished young from middle-aged animals with high accuracy; additionally, its most informative feature, power near 400-500 Hz, tracked synapse counts, indicating a readout of cochlear neural health rather than age. Applied without retraining to 56 human listeners, the gerbil-trained classifier separated age groups above chance. dAM EFRs thus offer a rapid, objective and clinically viable marker of CND.

Difficulties understanding speech in noise remain a common complaint even among listeners with normal hearing sensitivity, highlighting the need for objective, more effective measures of real-world listening. The goal of this study was to validate the use of a novel, chirped-speech (Cheech) stimulus - continuous, naturally-spoken speech fused with chirps designed to elicit robust auditory evoked potentials - to characterize relationships between speech recognition, listening effort, and auditory neural encoding. Twenty-five normal-hearing adults completed a sentence-recognition task using both original (unmodified) and Cheech-modified AzBio sentence lists in quiet, +3 dB, and -3 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions while neural responses from the brainstem through cortex were recorded simultaneously. Speech recognition remained near ceiling in quiet but declined with decreasing SNR for both original and Cheech stimuli. Compared with clean speech, Cheech-modified speech showed slightly poorer recognition performance as SNR decreased and somewhat higher perceived effort overall. Yet, Cheech was highly effective at evoking auditory responses from the brainstem (auditory brainstem response, ABR) through the cortex (including middle- and late-latency responses, MLR and LLR) even with <5 minutes listening time per condition. Neural responses showed reduced amplitudes and prolonged latencies as SNR decreased. In general, ABR latencies and wave I amplitudes were associated with speech-in-noise recognition performance, whereas cortical responses (MLR Na, Nb, and LLR P1) were associated with subjective workload. These findings show that Cheech-modified speech preserves intelligibility while yielding robust, multilevel neural recordings during sentence perception, offering a promising approach to examine hierarchical auditory processing under ecologically relevant speech-in-noise conditions.

Hearing aid users commonly report listening-related fatigue, which may contribute to disengagement from demanding listening situations and negative psychosocial outcomes. Hearing rehabilitation currently lacks strategies to mitigate listening fatigue, partly because fatigue build-up and its consequences are difficult to measure beyond self-report. This study investigated whether value-based listening decisions and associated frontal cortical activity are modulated by fatigue. Thirty hearing aid users completed a one-hour listening paradigm while cortical hemodynamic activity was measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). On each trial, participants decided whether to engage in listening or rest based on an offer defined by expected task difficulty and reward, and rated their momentary fatigue. Fatigue ratings increased over time, and unsuccessful listening trials were associated with larger subsequent increases in fatigue, suggesting that performance contributed to changes in self-reported fatigue. Listen-versus-rest decisions followed the expected effort-reward trade-off, with participants more likely to accept offers that provided higher rewards and lower listening demands. Over the course of the experiment, participants became less likely to accept listening offers; however, neither time on task nor subjective fatigue altered the weighting of reward and difficulty. In contrast, frontal cortical activation during evaluation of accepted offers increased over time for high-difficulty offers with low or medium rewards. Follow-up analyses indicated that frontal oxygenation and listening decisions were more strongly associated with time on task than with subjective fatigue ratings. Together, these findings suggest that behavioral and neural measures obtained before listening capture fatigue-related processes beyond self-report, providing a basis for identifying and potentially addressing fatigue in hearing rehabilitation.

Bilateral cochlear implantation (BCI) can improve spatial hearing in adults with bilateral hearing loss, but the early development of spatial hearing following sequential BCI remains poorly understood. This prospective longitudinal study investigated changes in spatial hearing experience in 23 adults undergoing sequential BCI, assessed before and at ~1, 3, and 8 months after bilateral implantation under two conditions: spontaneous and restrained head movements. Using a motion-tracking system combined with virtual reality, sound localization was assessed through absolute and signed errors, along with self-reported localization confidence and listening effort. Subjective spatial hearing was also assessed using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Localization performance improved by 1 month after bilateral implantation, as evidenced by a reduction of absolute error and in the bias toward the first-implanted ear. Participants reported greater localization confidence and lower listening effort at 1 month, although these changes were not consistently maintained at later follow-ups. SSQ scores showed improved spatial hearing at 1 month, speech perception at 3 months, and sound clarity and discriminability at 8 months. Compared with head-restrained condition, accuracy and confidence improved when spontaneous head rotations were allowed. The temporal trajectories of localization bias, confidence, and effort were modulated by the duration of experience with the first CI. These findings indicate that changes in spatial hearing can emerge soon after second CI activation. They further highlight the contribution of spontaneous head movements and previous CI experience, and support the use of complementary measures to monitor the early development of bilateral listening.

Objectives: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate (1) if the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) could be used to identify ears that meet cochlear implant (CI) candidacy beyond the "60/60" referral guidelines and (2) investigate the relationship between SII from patients' own hearing aids (HAs) and SII from optimally fit clinic-stock HAs such that a patient's own HAs can act as a proxy for an optimally fit HA and thus as a referral metric. Design: Prospective study of 23 participants ([&ge;] 18 years) with bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss who were CI candidates in at least one ear. SII-Clinic (SII-C) values were recorded with probe-microphone measures using a Verifit II device (NAL-N2 targets) with speech stimuli presented at 60 dB A during patient CI evaluation in either their own HAs or clinic-stock HAs. SII values from participants' own HAs were recorded as part of a larger research protocol, thus SII-Personal (SII-P), with probe-microphone measures using a Verifit I device (NAL-RP targets) with pink noise stimuli presented at 65 dB A. Participants that did not wear HAs did not have SII-P calculated. Data was collapsed across ears. Correlation analysis between SII and best-aided consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) was conducted. Benchmark SII values were extrapolated using a best-fit line and CI candidacy rates reflecting various aided CNC scores that could be applied across CI centers. Nested logistic regression models were used to determine if the SII-C could improve model fit beyond the revised ear-specific 60/60 referral guideline. The relationship between SII-C and SII-P was assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman correlation. Results: Correlation between SII-C and aided CNC score was r = 0.82 (p < 0.001), and the correlation between SII-P and aided CNC was r = 0.46 (p = 0.014). Extrapolated benchmarks of SII were calculated based on different CNC candidacy cutoffs, and benchmarks were able to capture at least 83% of the ears that met CNC candidacy cutoffs. SII was also found to improve model fit with word recognition score (WRS) and pure tone average (PTA) for 60% CNC candidacy cutoff ({chi}2 = 9.7; p = 0.002) and increased discrimination (AUC = 0.89 to AUC = 0.99). There was no significant difference between SII-C and SII-P using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p = 0.559). Conclusions: A larger study is needed that includes more ears that do not qualify for a CI; however, the results of this study demonstrate that (1) SII has the potential to be used in conjunction with the 60/60 referral guideline for CI candidacy evaluations and (2) SII can be used as a marker of audibility across different devices, including patients' own HAs, making SII an accessible metric during HA fittings and fine tunings.

Introduction Deafness is the most common human sensory deficit. Cochlear implantation is the primary intervention for severe-to-profound deafness. Currently, over 7000 people have bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) in the United Kingdom (UK), most of whom are children. Patient feedback suggests that for children with bilateral CIs, everyday communication is challenging and tiring, with extra effort required to integrate information from two ears, especially in noise, and that current rehabilitation techniques are not engaging, or appropriate to their lifestyles. To address these issues, researchers developed the Both EARS (BEARS) training package comprised of three virtual reality games to improve sound localization and listening in noise. Objectives This protocol describes the design and methodology of a multi-center phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether use of the BEARS training package alongside usual care compared to only receiving usual care improves speech-in-noise perception, hearing experiences, vocabulary and quality of life and reduces listening effort in children and young people (aged 8 -16 years (inclusive) with bilateral CIs. Methods This RCT is currently underway in 16 clinical CI departments in National Health Service or university hospitals across the UK. The intervention involves 3 months of spatial-listening training delivered via the BEARS training package in addition to any routine rehabilitation. The control is usual care (routine rehabilitation clinical care pathway). The primary outcome is the difference between the intervention groups in speech-in-noise perception score at 3 months derived from the spatial speech in noise (SSiN-VA) test. Recruitment closes at the end of the day on 31st July 2026, and end of data collection is 31st October 2026. Data analyses will be reported by 31st March 2026. Significance This is the largest known trial of children and young people with bilateral CIs. It will generate high-quality evidence on speech-in-noise outcomes and inform training interventions to improve spatial listening. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05808543; UKs clinical study registry (ISRCTN92454702)

Natural-sound research requires stimulus sets that combine acoustic standardization with detailed behavioural characterization. We present 1,377 two-second sounds representing 240 expert-defined source--action classes. We call this database "MaMa Sounds", as it resulted from the collaborative effort of two academic teams in Maastricht and Marseille. The sounds were manually curated, segmented, sampled at 16 kHz, and labelled with a noun identifying the source and a verb identifying the action. We release deidentified trial-level identification and familiarity data together with multiple per-sound norms (e.g., identification accuracy, confidence and agreement; familiarity), along with overall norms derived with principal component analysis. Noun, verb, and joint noun--verb norms are provided as direct means and medians with the number of contributing observations. This battery preserves process-specific information, while two principal-component scores provide compact overall behavioural-identifiability measures derived from response ease, semantic correspondence, agreement, and familiarity. The repository also contains deterministic response-cleaning code, participant and reference Word2Vec representations, and code reproducing the public sound-level tables. The resource supports stimulus selection, matching, and continuous modelling in auditory cognition and neuroscience.

Noise exposure can produce lasting auditory dysfunction in the absence of permanent threshold shifts or hair cell loss, yet the functional consequences of temporary threshold shift (TTS) remain poorly defined in translational models. We assessed auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in rhesus macaques (n = 13) at 2 and 9-10 months following a single moderate noise exposure that induced TTS. Previous histological analyses of these macaques showed no significant loss of hair cells or ribbon synapses but revealed persistent broadening of inner and outer hair cell ribbon-volume distributions. After exposure, DPOAE amplitudes and thresholds and ABR thresholds returned to pre-exposure values and showed low-frequency enhancement at later time points. Suprathreshold click- and tone-evoked ABR amplitudes were largely preserved or enhanced after exposure, consistent with compensatory gain. In contrast, macaque-specific chirp-evoked ABRs showed modest amplitude reductions and latency prolongation across waves, indicating altered neural synchrony at standard stimulus presentation rates, but with variable time courses. More temporally demanding paradigms revealed persistent impairments. ABRs to faster click rates and shorter paired-click intervals showed reduced adaptability in response amplitude and timing after normalization, with deficits persisting through 9-10 months. Increased inner hair cell ribbon-volume variability was more consistently associated with temporal response measures, including latency, paired-click recovery, and rate adaptation, than with amplitude-based ABR measures. Together, these findings reveal a lasting dissociation between response magnitude and fidelity after TTS: suprathreshold responses may be preserved or enhanced, while neural synchrony and temporal adaptability remain impaired. Increased presynaptic ribbon volume variability may serve as a structural marker of synaptic remodeling accompanying hidden auditory dysfunction, rather than as a direct determinant of suprathreshold response magnitude. Temporally demanding ABR paradigms may supplement threshold-based diagnostics for detecting persistent noise-induced auditory dysfunction.

Cochlear implant (CI) candidates with residual low frequency hearing increasingly receive hearing preserving electrode arrays to enable electric acoustic stimulation (EAS). However, assessing very low frequency hearing in newborns and young children remains difficult. Previous work has shown that acoustic stimulation can mask electrically evoked auditory percepts when stimulation sites are spatially separated. Whether such masking also occurs when electric stimulation is delivered near the round window (RW), prior to cochlear insertion, remains unclear. This study investigated ipsilateral acoustic masking of electric stimulation delivered at apical, basal, and near RW sites in 12 EAS users with residual low frequency hearing implanted with short or partially inserted electrode arrays. Using a psychophysical paradigm, threshold elevations of electric pulse trains were measured during simultaneous acoustic stimulation. Electric stimulation was applied at extra cochlear RW locations and intra cochlear basal and apical electrodes, while stimulation parameters were systematically varied. Electric stimulation near the RW reliably evoked auditory percepts without side effects, though optimal stimulation parameters and masking strength varied across participants. Strong acoustic masking was consistently observed for apical stimulation, whereas weaker but measurable masking occurred for basal and RW stimulation. A cochlear lumped parameter model indicated that approximately 5% of current delivered at the RW can reach apical regions, explaining the observed masking by low frequency acoustic tones. Masking strength correlated with residual hearing for apical stimulation only. These findings indicate that acoustic masking of apical electric stimulation, which correlated with residual hearing, holds potential as a diagnostic tool for assessing low frequency hearing post operatively. The detection of masking during both RW and basal stimulation represents a promising result, indicating that these stimulation paradigms can produce quantifiable effects. Given the considerable variability observed among participants, further investigation is required to establish the extent to which masking measures reflect residual hearing or hearing loss. Nonetheless, these results provide novel insight into auditory perception and side effects associated with basal and extra cochlear electric stimulation, informing future efforts to optimize this approach for low-frequency hearing assessment.

Predicting when an event will occur is key to perceiving and evaluating dynamic sensory inputs, such as speech. The utility of temporal predictions hinges on perceptual timing precision (PTP), the sensitivity to deviations between actual and predicted sound onset times. Past work suggests that PTP is primarily determined by acoustic properties of target sounds, regardless of the acoustics of preceding sound cues. In contrast, in four experiments, we discover that PTP is best when context and target sound spectra and temporal envelopes match, with only minor effects of individual sound acoustics. This ability to utilize contextual continuity improved with musical aptitude. Theoretical modeling showed that spectrally tuned oscillatory entrainment to sound onsets and offsets is necessary to account for our results. In sum, the precision of temporal predictions is defined not by the acoustics of individual sounds but by the continuity of spectral and temporal content within a sound stream.

Many individuals experience problems that are undetected by standard hearing tests, such as persistent tinnitus and difficulties understanding speech in background noise. Here, we report evidence of altered neural gain in young adults with self-reported listening problems despite exceptional hearing thresholds. Individuals reporting persistent tinnitus (the daily percept of sound in the absence of an external source) exhibited elevated thresholds of the middle ear muscle reflex, suggestive of altered gain in brainstem reflexive circuits, and reduced cortical responses to auditory spatial cues conveyed in the temporal fine structure of low-frequency sounds. Moreover, in both groups, greater self-reported speech-in-noise difficulties were associated with higher magnitude cortical responses, particularly at the highest stimulus intensity, consistent with elevated neural gain. Using a conceptual model, we demonstrate how damage to high-threshold auditory nerve fibres innervating cochlear nuclei can account for reduced activity of binaural neurons sensitive to the temporal fine structure of low-frequency sounds, generating a compensatory increase in neural gain in higher brain centres that impacts listening in complex environments.

The availability of hearing aids that can connect wirelessly to smartphone technologies via Bluetooth has grown exponentially in recent years. However, there is limited evidence assessing the benefits of user-adjustability afforded by these devices. This study aimed to assess the benefits of smartphone-connected hearing aids and an accompanying application (or app) in new and existing hearing aid users. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 44 adult hearing aid users (14 new and 30 existing) were recruited. Participants were fitted bilaterally with smartphone-connected hearing aids that could be adjusted by the user via an app. Self-reported outcome measures were collected at fitting and after seven-weeks of using the device in everyday life. For both new and existing hearing aid users, significant improvements in social participation, hearing-related fatigue, and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction were found. For existing hearing aid users, all outcomes were significantly better for the smartphone-connected hearing aids plus app in comparison to their existing hearing aids that did not connect to a smartphone, all with moderate-to-large clinical effect sizes (d> .6). User-controllability via the app was identified as the key benefit, and most participants (68%) reported that the app met their needs 'extremely' or 'very well'. These results suggest that, when used in conjunction with an app, smartphone-connected hearing aids can improve hearing outcomes due to greater user-controllability to improve listening. Thus, smartphone-connected hearing aids have the potential to facilitate patient-centred care, empowering the individual to successfully manage their hearing loss.

Sensorineural hearing loss can result from different pathologies, but the primary diagnostic method is a threshold-based audiogram, which is insensitive to some forms of cochlear dysfunction. Individuals may experience difficulty understanding speech in noise despite normal audiometric thresholds. Because most cochlear insults damage both inner (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs), the contribution of IHC dysfunction to auditory-nerve coding has been difficult to isolate. We used the IHC-selective ototoxicity of carboplatin in chinchillas to examine how IHC dysfunction, with preserved OHC function, affects temporal-envelope coding in auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs). Carboplatin produced 10 to 20% IHC loss with stereocilia damage in surviving IHCs, while OHC-dependent measures such as DPOAEs and ANF thresholds were unchanged. Suprathreshold ABR wave 1 was reduced, whereas wave 5 was preserved, suggesting central compensation. Both spontaneous and driven firing rates decreased following exposure. Mean vector strength to amplitude-modulated tones was unchanged, but response variability increased. Neurometric analysis and mutual information showed degraded AM detection in carboplatin-exposed fibers, an effect accounted for by reduced driven rate (i.e., normalizing spike counts across groups removed the group difference). Background noise degraded AM coding similarly in both groups. Pooled-neurometric modeling showed that population redundancy compensated for impaired fibers in quiet, but not in noise, where carboplatin-exposed pools remained worse. These findings indicate that IHC dysfunction degrades envelope coding by reducing neural output rather than by altering temporal synchrony. This study suggests IHC dysfunction is a phenotype consistent with "hidden hearing loss" (but distinct from cochlear synaptopathy), and motivates suprathreshold clinical assays.

The relationship between neural processes supporting perception, deviance processing, and post-perceptual task demands during auditory processing is not well understood. We used multitone masking and a no-report inattentional deafness paradigm to dissociate neural correlates of auditory perceptual awareness, deviance processing, and task demands. Evoked responses to physically identical target-tone pairs were recorded across three phases differing only in task instructions. In Phase A, human participants remained nave to (and thus unaware of) the target tones. In Phase B, participants were informed about (and thus aware of) the target tones. In Phase C, participants remained aware of the target tones and judged the duration of the silent gap between them, rendering them task-relevant. When participants were aware of them, target tones elicited an auditory awareness negativity and an increased positivity in the P3 window), with larger responses when target tones were additionally task-relevant. Furthermore, though largest in Phase C, deviant stimuli elicited a mismatch negativity across all task conditions, while a significant P3 to deviants was only observed in Phase C. Thus, early and late responses can be independently modulated by awareness, deviance, and task-relevance, indicating that they do not necessarily rely on shared neural mechanisms despite overlapping spatiotemporal profiles.

Auditory confounds have proven to be a major hurdle in the elucidation of veridical neuromodulation effects with transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS). Auditory noise masks are an essential method to reduce the audibility of TUS and have shown promise in several studies. Here we describe a novel approach for design, calibration, and psychometric validation of auditory noise masks to reduce the perceptibility of TUS. White noise masks and spectrum-tuned masks matched to a TUS protocol that generates highly salient auditory costimulation (487.5 Hz pulse repetition frequency, 10% duty cycle, 68 W/cm2 pulse-peak average intensity, 500 kHz acoustic frequency) were generated, and dB(A) levels were calibrated with an artificial ear. The masker levels needed to reduce TUS detection performance in a two-interval forced choice task were determined with an adaptive QUEST+ staircase in 20 neurotypical participants. Detection performance of this highly salient TUS protocol was driven to near chance performance (<55%) in 17/20 participants with white-noise and 18/20 participants with spectrum-tuned noise. However, high masker levels approaching safety limits were needed to render TUS inaudible for the majority of participants, indicating the need for formal masker calibration for these TUS settings. Additionally, against expectation the spectrum-tuned masker did not significantly outperform the white-noise masker, suggesting that perceptibility of TUS auditory costimulation does not lawfully follow the sound expected from its pulse envelope and the known spectrum of human hearing.